Analysis
The rule of law is explicitly defined in **Article 2 TEU** (Treaty on European Union) as a core value binding all member states, not merely an abstract ideal. Its practical implications—such as judicial independence, legal certainty, and anti-corruption measures—directly affect daily life, from contract enforcement for businesses to fundamental rights protections for citizens. The European Commission has repeatedly emphasized this link, including in **2020-2022 rule of law reports** and infringement procedures against Poland and Hungary. Von der Leyen’s framing aligns with EU case law (e.g., **CJEU rulings on judicial reforms in Poland**) and political declarations.
Background
The rule of law has been a contentious issue in the EU, particularly regarding Poland and Hungary, where reforms undermining judicial independence and media freedom triggered **Article 7 TEU proceedings** and funding conditionality mechanisms. The EU’s **2020 Rule of Law Mechanism** formalized monitoring, tying compliance to budgetary disbursements (e.g., **NextGenerationEU funds**). Von der Leyen’s statement reflects the Commission’s longstanding position that rule of law violations threaten the single market and democratic cohesion.
Verdict summary
Ursula von der Leyen’s statement accurately reflects the EU’s legal framework, where the rule of law is a foundational principle enshrined in treaties and directly impacts citizens, businesses, and the functioning of the Union.