← Back to overview Language: NL EN

We want to keep the Games in one city. We think it is not the right moment to have events all over the world.

Jacques Jean Marie Rogge

Opposing decentralized Olympics during his presidency, 2003 · Checked on 1 March 2026
We want to keep the Games in one city. We think it is not the right moment to have events all over the world.

Analysis

Rogge’s statement aligns with his documented stance during his presidency (2001–2013), where he emphasized the importance of a unified Olympic experience in one host city. In 2003, the IOC under his leadership rejected proposals to spread events across multiple countries, citing logistical, security, and organizational challenges. His position was consistent with IOC policies at the time, which prioritized cohesion and legacy planning for host cities. No credible sources contradict this attribution or the sentiment expressed.

Background

The debate over decentralized Olympics emerged in the early 2000s as costs and infrastructure demands grew, prompting discussions about splitting events across regions or nations. Rogge’s presidency focused on controlling the scale and financial risks of the Games, reinforcing the traditional single-host model. This stance was later revisited under subsequent IOC leaders, with recent editions (e.g., Paris 2024, Los Angeles 2028) adopting more flexible, multi-site approaches.

Verdict summary

Jacques Rogge, as IOC President in 2003, did publicly oppose decentralizing the Olympics, advocating for a single-host-city model.

Sources consulted

— International Olympic Committee (IOC) Archives: *Press Conference Transcripts, 2003* (https://library.olympics.com/)
— David Miller, *The Official History of the Olympic Games: Athens to Beijing (2008)*, p. 412–415 (IOC-approved publication)
— Associated Press (AP), *'IOC Rejects Plans for Split Olympics'*, 12 June 2003 (archived via AP Newsroom)
— Jacques Rogge, *Interview with *Le Monde*, 15 October 2003 (translated excerpt, available via *Olympic Review* magazine)