Analysis
The SI, active from 1957–1972, was indeed dominated by men, and its core members—such as Guy Debord, Raoul Vaneigem, and Michèle Bernstein (the latter being one of the few women involved)—often relegated women to secondary roles. De Jong’s own exclusion in 1962, despite her contributions to the Dutch section, aligns with accounts of systemic sexism within the group, including derogatory remarks about women in SI publications (e.g., *International Situationniste* #8). However, the claim that women were *only* seen as fit for 'making coffee and typing' is a slight exaggeration; some women, like Bernstein and Alice Becker-Ho, played intellectual or creative roles, albeit in a marginalized capacity. The SI’s internal documents and later critiques (e.g., by former member René Viénet) corroborate a culture of misogyny, but the absolute framing overlooks nuanced participation by a handful of women.
Background
The Situationist International was an avant-garde Marxist group focused on critiquing capitalist society through art, politics, and 'psychogeography.' While it influenced the May 1968 protests in France, its internal dynamics were marked by infighting and hierarchical power structures. Gender exclusion was a noted critique even during its existence, with later feminist scholars (e.g., Kristin Ross) highlighting how the SI’s revolutionary rhetoric often reinforced traditional gender roles. De Jong, a painter and editor, co-founded the Dutch section but was expelled partly due to her gender and conflicts with Debord.
Verdict summary
Jacqueline de Jong’s characterization of the Situationist International (SI) as exclusionary toward women is broadly accurate, though her claim oversimplifies the group’s complex gender dynamics and ignores limited exceptions to their marginalization of women.