Analysis
Clinton admitted he was not 'explicit enough' about his relationship with Lewinsky, which is true in that he avoided full transparency. However, the statement downplays his active role in encouraging others (e.g., aides, Lewinsky) to obscure the truth, such as through evasive legal definitions (e.g., 'it depends on what the meaning of *is* is'). Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's report later documented efforts to conceal the affair.
Background
The statement was part of Clinton's August 17, 1998, nationally televised apology after months of denying the affair under oath. The Lewinsky scandal led to his impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice, though he was acquitted by the Senate.
Verdict summary
Clinton's statement acknowledges a lack of clarity but omits his direct role in misleading others.