Analyse
Pääbo’s statement aligns with historical accounts: the scientific community *was* initially skeptical about sequencing ancient DNA at scale due to contamination risks and degradation. His team’s 2006 publication of **1 million base pairs (~0.03% of the genome)**—later scaled to **1% by 2009**—demonstrated feasibility, a critical proof-of-concept. Peer-reviewed sources and Pääbo’s own writings (e.g., *Neanderthal Man*, 2014) confirm this timeline. The 2010 *Nature* interview context further corroborates his retrospective assessment.
Achtergrond
Before Pääbo’s work, ancient DNA research was limited to short mitochondrial sequences. His lab’s innovations in **targeted enrichment** and **contamination control** (e.g., 454 sequencing, clean-room protocols) enabled nuclear genome recovery. The **2010 draft Neanderthal genome** (*Science*)—built on these early milestones—revolutionized paleogenomics, proving interbreeding with modern humans and reshaping evolutionary narratives.
Samenvatting verdict
Svante Pääbo’s 2010 claim about early skepticism toward Neanderthal genome sequencing and the 1% milestone is accurate and well-documented.