Analyse
The **GCM** is explicitly non-binding, as affirmed in its **preamble (Paragraph 7)** and by the **UN General Assembly resolution (A/RES/73/195)** that endorsed it. The text emphasizes *international cooperation* and *shared responsibility* but lacks enforcement mechanisms, relying instead on political and moral commitment. Vitorino’s characterization aligns with the **UN’s official position** and independent legal analyses (e.g., by the **International Organization for Migration**). The 'morally compelling' claim is subjective but reflects the GCM’s framing as a *normative* (not legal) instrument.
Achtergrond
Adopted in **Marrakech (December 2018)** after 18 months of negotiations, the GCM is the first intergovernmental agreement to address migration comprehensively under the UN. It outlines **23 objectives** (e.g., combating trafficking, ensuring safe return) but was **contested by several states** (e.g., U.S., Hungary) over sovereignty concerns. The **non-binding nature** was a deliberate compromise to secure broad—though not universal—support (152 states adopted it).
Samenvatting verdict
António Vitorino’s statement accurately describes the **UN Global Compact for Migration (GCM)** as a non-legally binding but morally influential framework adopted in 2018.